The
NFL’s Other Story
While the airwaves and print media recycle their outrage
over the revelations of domestic violence perpetrated by Ray Rice against his
fiancé at the time and Adrian Peterson against his 4-year old son, the focus
has shifted from the alleged crimes themselves to the NFL’s cover-up.
Reminiscent of US Presidents’ own cover-up stories that
ended in impeachments and the Catholic Church’s sordid history of protecting
priests’ acts of pedophilia, the media reflects public outrage.
Will this storm be as quickly forgotten as the storm
about the long-term debilitating effects of injuries suffered by NFL players?
Will the concussion controversy be swept under million-dollar settlements with
retired players or clever marketing campaigns?
As these scandals come to light, and regardless of how
they’ll be eventually settled, they also shed light on the NFL itself as one of
the most successful financial enterprises in the American entertainment
industry.
To begin with, though race and class issues have been
raised in media explanations of the behavior of NFL players, we are dealing
here with millionaires, after all. The lowest NFL contractual salary per year
is $375,000 (with an average of $1.9 million). Even if the average playing
career of NFL players is short, this is a handsome compensation.
When we direct our ire at Commissioner Roger Goodell, we should
remind ourselves that his annual compensation exceeds $44 million—not bad for
the so-called sheriff of football. You’d think that for that salary he could
have the courage to deal with criminals among his flock. Can we expect some
moral courage as well, or is this too much to ask of a millionaire?
But with all of this money flowing, what we forget is
that the NFL is a non-profit
organization with strong players union.
For devout fans—NFL games attract more viewers per game than any other sport—these
facts might not be known. Non-profit? With an estimated $9 billion in annual
revenue, how is it conceivable that the IRS would recognize such an
organization as non-profit?
We know that the Church of Scientology has had its
run-ins with the IRS, because of its dubious claims of religious practices. Is
the NFL the new American religion? Does the worship of athletic celebrities
warrant non-profit designation? I’m sure some clever lawyer made the argument
that allowed for this ridiculous designation, but does that mean that game
tickets are tax-deductible?
From a business perspective, this non-profit status is
fascinating—who wouldn’t want to shelter profits in a similar fashion?—but not nearly
as fascinating as the communal, even socialist, rules governing the league.
Last Sunday, there were three big upsets in the league:
the Chicago Bears defeated the 49ers in their new stadium south of
San-Francisco, San Diego defeated the 2013 Super-Bowl champions, the Seattle
Seahawks, and Cleveland defeated the New Orleans Saints. How is that possible?
Why is it that on any given Sunday, any team, even the statistically worst one,
can beat the best?
The NFL is the model of real competition, the one Adam
Smith already envisioned, and the one economists theorize about. If any
participant team in the football market can beat anyone else, there must be
some fairness in this game. How is fair play in the NFL guaranteed?
Though not government-imposed, there is league-imposed salary
cap on all teams, so that the best and the worst cannot outspend each other.
This way rich owners cannot skew the results of games by buying all the
available talent in one year (the way it’s done in baseball, for example).
This imposed equality—socialist if I ever saw one—is an
accepted, unquestioned feature of the game of billionaires (one of the worst
teams in the league, the Buffalo Bills, was just sold for $1.4 billion). Would
these same billionaires agree to such caps in other markets? Would they agree
that fair competition requires strict regulations and enforcement, even unions?
Instead of reciting Adam Smith’s cliché of Invisible
Hand—unbridled competition despite monopolistic tendencies and barriers to
market entry—we should recall his more nuanced and insightful Impartial
Spectator. Focusing on morality, Smith insisted that our conscience be our guide,
that our moral sentiments can ensure fair dealings with others.
As we delight in the socialist-framed competition of the
NFL, we may also want to encourage owners, players, and fans alike to think in
moral terms about their moral responsibility on and off the field. Celebrity
status comes at a price, and so are the expectations of millionaire athletes:
they are role models to young viewers and future players. As such, domestic
violence, drug abuse, and DUIs should be fully excised from their daily diet.
Raphael
Sassower is professor of philosophy at UCCS. He co-authored with Jeff Scholes Religion and Sports in American Culture
(2014). He can be reached at rsassower@gmail.com See
previous articles at sassower.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment